[MD] The MOQ and religions

[Joseph Maurer]

On 12/31/09 6:02 PM, "Mary Clark" <marysonthego at gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>
When you think about it, there's a kind of odd kinship between the
Biological and Intellectual levels too.  Both are opposed to Social level
restrictions - just coming at it from different directions.  The Biological
level says the Social level is bad because it prevents you from doing what
feels good.  The Intellectual level says the Social level is bad because it
prevents you from asking questions.
 
Just a thought,
Mary
 

Hi Mary and all,

When I fly by the seat of my pants, I like to have a model or
direction-finder for where I am going. As a singer, I prefer the model of
the musical octave Do, Re, Mi_Fa, Sol, La, Ti_Do for evolution.  The thing
about the octave is that there are two naturally occurring intervals Mi_Fa,
Ti_Do, at which any mechanical schema breaks down.  If a pitch is going to
double in vibrations the last note of seven is shocked, and looks to the
mi_fa interval for support.

Inorganic_organic, Social, Intellectual seems to require some manipulations
to include everything. E.G., to divorce intellectuality from a social
structure requires the ultra-precise burden of a different consciousness
(dq) at each level. Do inorganic, RE organic single-cell reproduction, Mi
organic two-cell reproduction, _Fa emotions, Sol intellectual, La
higher-emotions, Ti higher-intellectual.  Evolution stops unable to cross
the barrier and can only double in intensity, enlightenment.

Joe

> When you think about it, there's a kind of odd kinship between the
> Biological and Intellectual levels too.  Both are opposed to Social level
> restrictions - just coming at it from different directions.  The Biological
> level says the Social level is bad because it prevents you from doing what
> feels good.  The Intellectual level says the Social level is bad because it
> prevents you from asking questions.
> 
> Just a thought,
> Mary