[MD] Where does logic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[skutvik at online.no]

All

2 Jan.:

I received this from Andre
:
> Quality subordinate to 1+1=2? Where do you get that from Bodvar?
> Quality is not subordinate to anything. Rather Quality has 1+1=2.
> Quality is direct experience, the non-intellectual cutting edge. Please
> do not reduce Quality to some logical sequence of events. 

Please give me hell on this point, I'm happy to be corrected. Will 
have to think some more on this issue.

Marsha wrote the same day:

> I have been haunted by something I read a while ago:  All knowledge is
> to some degree false because it is to some degree incomplete.  
> Wouldn't this make knowledge both true and false? 

Knowledge in intellect-as-SOM's ultimate "true,objective" sense is not 
tenable, but we must not throw the baby out with the water, i.e. 
declare intellect-as-a-Q-level's immense S/O value to be worthless. 
This is the effect I fear from the "MOQ-an-intellectual-pattern" faction, 
namely that the MOQ is a "better intellectual idea" which is it isn't, it's 
no intellectual pattern but something that has departed from intellect-
as.SOM and transformed into its own 4th static level  I hope you still 
subscribe to the SOL.   

> And this morning I read that Feyerbend called the laws of formal logic
> naive.  Margolis says much about adding Indeterminate to the bipolar
> truth-values: True or False, but I'm finding his book very difficult
> because he mentions dozens of philosophers (briefly stating their
> argument) I have never heard of, and who seem to have some professional
> stake in this game.  But I wonder that DQ is present in every event and
> it is indeterminate.  Hmmm.

But this is something else. Logic through which "gates" experience 
must pass to be perceived (the simplest of which is 1+1=2) cannot be 
violated or declared "naive". Understand? Intellect's science may 
make a lot of "findings" that later shows to be wrong, but 1+1=2 will 
never be found wrong  This is what has begun to worry me of late. 
Where does logic itself belong in the MOQ? 

Happy to hear your (all) opinion.

Bodvar