[MD] Where does logic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[X Acto]

Bodvar:
But this is something else. Logic through which "gates" experience 
must pass to be perceived (the simplest of which is 1+1=2) cannot be 
violated or declared "naive". Understand? Intellect's science may 
make a lot of "findings" that later shows to be wrong, but 1+1=2 will 
never be found wrong  This is what has begun to worry me of late. 
Where does logic itself belong in the MOQ? 

Happy to hear your (all) opinion.

Ron:
Experience, in my own opinion, is partially constructed
through memory.
Logic,(the simplest of which is 1+1=2) may be found wrong
and may be proven wrong. 1+1 may also equal 3.
1+1 may also equal 1. 

1 what? what is being considered the standard of 1?
only in absolute abstraction does 1 have meaning
when it does not have any correspondance with
experience.

but when applied to experience...1+1=2 may have
many outcomes, ask any engineer.
















Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/