[MD] Where does logic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[MarshaV]

Hello Bo,

I have never stated that 'concept' and 'language' were exact synonyms.  I haven't any idea from where you've pulled a phrase like "destroyer of", and I never used the terms "unpatterned bliss".  !!!Never used the word bliss and never used the word destroyed.  That doesn't even make sense to me.  I have said that, for me, the MoQ represents Quality: unpatterned experience and patterned experience.  -  You are shoveling baloney!  What grates against your projections is really not my problem, but your nasty comments without context is not very fair or intelligent.  If you disagree with something I've said, state it clearly, because maybe it's something I need to consider, or not.   Or maybe it's something you have misinterpreted.    

Maybe you can re-explain, in unbiased language, what I said to upset you.        



Marsha   










On Jan 3, 2010, at 1:39 PM, skutvik at online.no wrote:

> Hi Marsha 
> 
> 3 Jan. you wrote:
> 
>> Changing the subject doesn't get you off the hook so again:
> 
>> Please state which of my statements you are calling  "Marshas woolly
>> nonsense."  At lease give me an opportunity to defend my position.  
> 
> It's your concepts (language) as the destroyer of unpatterned bliss 
> that grates my ....  intelligence. The Quality/MOQ "meta-metaphysics" 
> is what prevents an understanding of the Quality Metaphysics.
> 
> In my opinion
> 
> Bodvar
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

  
_______________________________________________________________________
   
Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...