[MD] Where does logic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[MarshaV]

Greetings Bo,

I cannot untangle what you are getting at.

I use what is true to my experience.  How's this: I have awareness of Quality as unpatterned experience and patterned experience.  I'm not saying anything about DQ; it much to big for me to grasp, besides DQ is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.  

or


The MoQ says there is Quality:  Dynamic Quality (indivisible, undefinable and unknowable)and static quality (patterns/ analogues).  Marsha says she is aware of Quality as unpatterned experience and patterned experience. 

Please notice I didn't use the phrase 'destroy DQ' or 'unpatterned bliss'.   


Marsha

 
 






On Jan 5, 2010, at 2:36 PM, skutvik at online.no wrote:

> Hi again Marsha
> 
> 4 Jan. you said
> 
>> I have nothing to say about DQ, it is indivisible, undefinable and
>> unknowable.  Please understand this.  I talk only of my experience of
>> Quality as unpatterned experience and patterned experience.  The
>> disguise is your projection.  
> 
> We may be driving ourselves mutually nuts over this issue. What you 
> say about DQ is what there can be said about DQ and this is said by 
> the MOQ. What irks me is the notion that even saying/writing this 
> makes DQ some lesser article than the real DQ "out there" i.e. Pirsig's 
> Quality/MOQ "super-metaphysics" that overrides the MOQ.  
> 
> Bodvar
>