[MD] Intellectual and Social
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Mon Jan 11 12:17:26 PST 2010
Holy.. fucking ....shit...Matt is finally out with it...
about god damned time....
-Ron
----- Original Message ----
From: Matt Kundert <pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Mon, January 11, 2010 2:05:16 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Intellectual and Social
Steve said:
I think Matt Kundert would argue that the sort of
metaphysical certainty you are looking for is what drove
Pirsig to insanity and later to developing a new
metaphysics.
Matt, what do you think? Did Pirsig find some comfortable
resolution in his quest for certainty?
Matt:
Well, in Pirsig's case, I think chemical imbalances played a
big role in what happened, but yeah, the quest for
certainty drove him off a cliff.
When you state "his quest," I think we have to answer
yes. From what little appearances we know of Bob
Pirsig's life since the time of ZMM, he's been able to
control the demons that left him in the corner of a
Chicago apartment with cigarettes burning into his
knuckles. I think the most important thing to understand
about Pirsig's philosophy is the personal nature Pirsig
most of the time perceives to be at the heart of the
philosophical enterprise. This is the point at which we
might bring up the James picture of a hallway with
different doors, or an art gallery with a myriad of
paintings. This, of course, makes Pirsig sound like he
only half-meant the Metaphysics of Quality. Emphasizing
the fact that Pirsig thought philosophy was like playing
chess, rather than having a perfect set of chess moves,
suggests to some that the system Pirsig created is
trying to be ignored. The question is: how do we
balance Chapter 26 of Lila, the philosophology chapter
wherein Pirsig tells us how to read philosophy, with
Chapter 12, the levels chapter wherein Pirsig solves a
few philosophical problems with his Metaphysics of
Quality?
Pirsig attempted to develop a new metaphysics not just
for himself, but for others, too--everybody gets that. The
Metaphysics of Quality wasn't _just_ for Pirsig. However,
the way to balance the self-other equation might be like
this: the Metaphysics of Quality is Pirsig's, but the
insights of the Metaphysics of Quality are for everyone.
The "comfortable resolution" of a quest can only be
decided by the life lived, because that's ultimately where
philosophy dumps out. I think one of the greatest
passages Pirsig wrote is the gumption chapter in ZMM.
In that chapter, Pirsig brought together philosophical
abstraction with practical living--he showed us how he
thinks his explorations of the "high country of the mind"
dump out into the valleys of life. What he shows is how a
mind can get trapped in certain thought-loops, like the
monkey and the rice. That's what happened to Phaedrus.
_That's_ the problem with the Quest for Certainty. What
Pirsig picked up are techniques for quelling the inferential
machine known as the mind--that's what the art of
meditation specifically helps with. Pirsig perceived (rightly
I think) the modern mind as quickly skipping down a road
that will eventually prove to be self-destructive to both
individual and society. So Pirsig wanted to expand a
different set of roads, to show how we don't need to run
into dilemmas like "where is the value, in the subject or
object?"
But there are _many_ ways of avoiding certain bad trains
of thought--Pirsig's one occasional fault is that he
sometimes creates the appearance of yelling out alone at
night. But there are a _lot_ of intellectuals who perceive
similiar evils and propose useful techniques and roads of
travel. The one major problem caused by Pirsig's
occasional flirtation with superlative uniqueness, which
we could forgive in a friend, is that it leads to inflexibility
of thought in fellow-travelers. It leads people to perceive
themselves as _not_ fellow-travelers, but rather disciples.
It leads to the thought that edifices of thought generated
by thinkers must be either rejected or accepted
wholecloth, and that disagreement with the master is a
rejection of everything holy.
Pirsig became comfortable with his quest for certainty
because he eventually learned how to tone down the
personal ramifications for failure. I think he learned that
it isn't a Quest for Certainty that the philosophical
tradition is in search of an answer to, but rather a
personal quest for the kinds of everyday certainties that
we act out of. Phaedrus' quest in ZMM may have begun
as Plato's, but Pirsig's quest in writing it down was the
quest to resolve doubts about the everyday certainties
that are leading to bad things. Phaedrus began with
Doubt about the possibility of Certainty, but Pirsig
finished with specific doubts about particular certainties.
Pirsig eventually became comfortable with the line of
thought he'd written down, and the kinds of life-instincts
it had given him.
That _others_ may not be comfortable
with his resolution only matters insofar as what is being
pointed to are limitations in the tools and insights he
afforded. Philosophy is autobiographical--we are
commending things we've found useful. What philosophy
is not is a search for an Answer to an antecedantly
posed Question, like from Reality, or some other entity
that's big and powerful enough to be able to pose a
question antecedantly to spatialtemporal people. Only
with the latter understanding of philosophy does it make
sense to "reject the MoQ," or any system. Only if one
assumes that there are universally perspicuous
questions that every philosophy or person must have an
answer to, would one think that the MoQ's success rests
on its ability to please everyone. Only if one thinks
there's a big universal Quest humanity is on, rather than
a lot of little quests individual people are on, will one
take seriously the rhetoric of "demonstration" and
"proving."
Philosophy is autobiography for Pirsig, and it is best
served by taking it seriously, but not too seriously.
Matt
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list