[MD] Waiter, I don't think this Quality is any Good

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 12 01:07:00 PST 2010


Hello John,

The list of labels I might apply to myself is long, but for the moment I am happy to call myself a MoQ'er.  
Value, Quality, Experience, all unpatterned & patterned or Dynamic & static, seems as real as it gets, 
but I might also say that my experiences are both conventional and Empty.  Why I choose to call myself 
a MoQ'er rather than a Buddhist is because I think the MoQ offers an excellent bridge between East
 and West in the four levels and their goodness.       

I am a MoQ'er.   


Marsha 






On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:04 PM, John Carl wrote:

> I agree Marsha with you when you say its all about the now.
> 
> Does that mean you're an existentialist also?
> 
> 
> Its not the thinking about the goodness, but the goodness of the thinking
> that matters.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> John,
>> 
>> Quality is goodness, it's the thinking about it that ruins it.
>> 
>> 
>> While sustaining biological and social patterns
>> Kill all intellectual patterns.
>> Kill them completely
>> And then follow Dynamic Quality
>> And morality will be served.
>>   (LILA, Chapter 32)
>> 
>> 
>> For me, Quality/Goodness is everywhere in the now.  Not the past, not the
>> future, but now.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
_______________________________________________________________________
   
Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...     
 









More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list