[MD] Waiter, I don't think this Quality is any Good
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 12 01:07:00 PST 2010
Hello John,
The list of labels I might apply to myself is long, but for the moment I am happy to call myself a MoQ'er.
Value, Quality, Experience, all unpatterned & patterned or Dynamic & static, seems as real as it gets,
but I might also say that my experiences are both conventional and Empty. Why I choose to call myself
a MoQ'er rather than a Buddhist is because I think the MoQ offers an excellent bridge between East
and West in the four levels and their goodness.
I am a MoQ'er.
Marsha
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:04 PM, John Carl wrote:
> I agree Marsha with you when you say its all about the now.
>
> Does that mean you're an existentialist also?
>
>
> Its not the thinking about the goodness, but the goodness of the thinking
> that matters.
>
> John
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Quality is goodness, it's the thinking about it that ruins it.
>>
>>
>> While sustaining biological and social patterns
>> Kill all intellectual patterns.
>> Kill them completely
>> And then follow Dynamic Quality
>> And morality will be served.
>> (LILA, Chapter 32)
>>
>>
>> For me, Quality/Goodness is everywhere in the now. Not the past, not the
>> future, but now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________________________________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list