[MD] Metaphysics

[markhsmit]

Does it have anything to do with the word quality?

Mark
On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:08:43 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
From:   MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
Subject:    Re: [MD] Metaphysics
Date:   January 15, 2010 12:08:43 AM PST
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org

On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:55 AM, markhsmit wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> Are we still referring to Quality at that which represents something
> being better than another and its expression through increasing
> betterness? Or are we getting more mystical?
> 
> I just want to get on the same plane as you.
> 
> Mark

Mark,

I can over complicate with the best of them. Nearest my heart is
Quality(unpatterned experience and patterned experience.)


Marsha







> 
> On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:28:53 PM, "X Acto" <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> Marsha:
> You've got one sad ego.
> 
> You are satisfied with the MoQ as a theory. I am satisfied with the MoQ representing 
> insight and experience. I do not know if what Bo says is based on experience or
> not. For me, Quality IS reality; Quality being unpatterned experience and
> patterned experience. So maybe the MoQ is both theory and experience.
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


_______________________________________________________________________

Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... 







Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/