[MD] Metaphysics

[markhsmit]

Marsha,

Thanks for the Buddhist reference.

You are avoiding my question, and this is not
a trap.  Let's say that Quality casts a shadow.
This shadow shows up as patterns and unpatterns.
Those shadows are not Quality itself, but our
view of it through the brain etc.  We like some
of these shadows more than others.  The shadows
are dynamically changing so that they are
becoming more and more those we like.
Is this what you are talking about?

This is what I am asking when I
request a clarification.  Quality as a word has
a certain connotation in the English language.
Are we still working off that connotation, or
have we changed the meaning of the word?

Mark

On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:33:20 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
From:   MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
Subject:    Re: [MD] Metaphysics
Date:   January 15, 2010 11:33:20 PM PST
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org

Hi Mark,

I am tempted to say MU, but... 

To the mind it is a pattern, in itself --- reality.


Marsha 






On Jan 16, 2010, at 2:04 AM, markhsmit wrote:

> Does it have anything to do with the word quality?
> 
> Mark
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:08:43 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> Subject: Re: [MD] Metaphysics
> Date: January 15, 2010 12:08:43 AM PST
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> 
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:55 AM, markhsmit wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marsha,
>> Are we still referring to Quality at that which represents something
>> being better than another and its expression through increasing
>> betterness? Or are we getting more mystical?
>> 
>> I just want to get on the same plane as you.
>> 
>> Mark
> 
> Mark,
> 
> I can over complicate with the best of them. Nearest my heart is
> Quality(unpatterned experience and patterned experience.)
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:28:53 PM, "X Acto" <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> Marsha:
>> You've got one sad ego.
>> 
>> You are satisfied with the MoQ as a theory. I am satisfied with the MoQ representing 
>> insight and experience. I do not know if what Bo says is based on experience or
>> not. For me, Quality IS reality; Quality being unpatterned experience and
>> patterned experience. So maybe the MoQ is both theory and experience.
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


_______________________________________________________________________

Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... 







Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/