[MD] Where does logic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[Andre Broersen]

Steve to Ham:
If, on the other hand, you see your participation here as only for the
purpose of promoting your Essentialism, I'm not interested in having a
conversation with you. That sounds unfriendly, but I don't mean it to
be. I'm just really not interested right now in that brand of
philosophy.

No, Quality is not viewed as cognizant.

Chicken and egg again.

It may be worth the effort to understand and appreciate Pirsig as a
fellow artist.

Ham:
> For your information I have not only read ZMM, LILA, the SODV paper, and
> Ant's doctorial, but have "chewed over" them for six years.

Steve:
Excellent!

Andre:
Hi Steve, I usually do not piss people off who have a genuine question
and show genuine interest. Ham's response to your efforts have
vindicated my response to Ham. And I am not real happy about this. But
Ham is a cognizant proprioceptive valuing subjective agent. And will
not change his ways. Same as Platt.

Andre