[MD] Where does logic itself belong inside the MOQ?

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi and goodbye Magnus

16 Jan. you wrote:

> I've spent quite a bit of thinking on the levels and I'd stick my nose
> out and say that I have a good understanding of what constitutes a new
> level. It has nothing to do with what appeals to me, you or anyone.
> It's simply completely different ways to build stuff.

What the MOQ doesn't need is more obscure levels. No doubt you 
have been thinking, but I'm afraid it's a scientific - physicist-like - kind 
of thinking like Doug Renselle and his inscrutable tables of sub-
inorganic - quantum - levels. The MOQ is more about the moral 
struggles that occur in the wake of the static train,  which  is what 
gives it its enormous explanatory power. What struggles and moral 
codes forming between some obscure sub-inorganic isn't very 
instrumental. What appeals is what have Quality and yours has zero 
such, l should have known better.

Bodvar