[MD] Intellect's Symposium

[Krimel]

[Joe]
"percepts" DQ!  "Concepts" SQ!

[Krimel]
Thanks, Joe. It really isn't all that complicated is it?


----------------------------------

>> [Krimel]
>> This problem of continuous and discontinuous is a major big deal. James
>> handles it very well in "Some Problems of Philosophy" where he makes a
>> distinction between perception which is continuous and conception which
is
>> discrete. The distinction is an important one and much confusion results
>> when we don't acknowledge it. Which, by the way, many here don't and
their
>> confusion is plain to see.
> 
> [John]
> Well here you're dabbling in my area of interest where Royce argues
against
> Jame's position by asserting that humans are never possessed of either
pure
> perception or pure conception; our knowledge is always an imperfect union
of
> the two.    Pragmatism presupposes not some synthesis  but an
> interpretation.  Like all life.
> 
> [Krimel]
> In the chapters I am talking about James talks about perception as
immediate
> not pure. James thought perception was the integration, or making sense,
of
> sensation. Concepts are ways of connecting past perceptions together. We
use
> them to organize our memory. We break the world back up into parts and
> reassemble it according to the demands of the present. James acknowledges
> the interplay of percepts and concepts. But he says that concepts are
> derived from percepts and ultimately must be brought into conformity to
> them.
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/