[MD] The difference between a Monet and a finger painting
Ant McWatt
antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk
Mon Jan 18 18:03:51 PST 2010
On 18 Jan 2010 at 12:53, John Carl wrote (in the [MD] thread "Atheistic Philosophy vs Anti-theistic"):
“ I believe I'll salute Ed Abbey's ragged flag of reason, posted to Platt earlier.”
Platt responded January 18th:
“Except reason cannot tell the difference between a Monet and a finger painting.”
John Carl then replied January 18th:
“Well maybe not your Reason, Platt, but mine and Ed's can tell the difference.”
Ant McWatt comments:
I would tend to agree with John here. This is because the MOQ implies that a master in fine art is not totally working Dynamically (i.e. just within the code of Art) but also incorporates the
intellectual techniques (i.e. the accepted manipulation of painted symbols and motifs in which to produce traditional “good” art) of the fine artists preceding him or her (even if only to a small degree). As with the best literature or music, the accepted rules for high quality work usually need to be learnt before they can be broken; if this step is avoided you risk ending-up with an "art" piece by a Tracey Emin rather than an art piece by a Picasso (at his best anyway).
Like Picasso, Monet initially studied and emulated previous masters (for this, he attended the École des Beaux-Arts and the Académie Suisse) so even in a later painting where his cataracts were seriously impairing his sight (such as 1923’s “Japanese Bridge”) there are both traditional and Dynamic elements seen here not found in a conventional finger painting (such as that of a young child where the rules of previous artistic tradition haven’t been largely grasped yet or, for that matter, any new, successful techniques introduced). This is why a half decent art historian should be able to tell the difference between a Monet and a child’s finger painting without too much difficulty!
.
_________________________________________________________________
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list