[MD] Celebrity

[Ian Glendinning]

Jeez,

The idea that celebrity (or any static pattern) might cloud one's
judgement was the no-brainer the primary assertion, given that ... ,
etc (agreeing is good but not necessary).
The point was ...

Pirsig understands this.
Dawkins doesn't get it.

(See the finger painting thread.)
Ian

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:36 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Andre,
>
> All (in the conventional sense) static patterns of value cloud ones
> judgement.   Would you disagree, or state it differently?
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
>
>> Marsha to Ian:
>> Missed your point, but you set me straight.  So now happy we agree.
>>
>> Andre:
>> I know my internet connection is bad so I may have missed a few issues
>> of posts: what are you two agreeing on? That celebrity clouds your
>> judgement?
>>
>> The patterns holding the 'celebrity' clouds judgement about what? The
>> patterns? The mirrors? The reflections? What?
>>
>> Andre
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>