[MD] grmbl

[Andre Broersen]

Bodvar to Andre:

However something induced them to quit this - that came to be the obsession of
the West - to embrace the development that resembles the early MOQ
with the  S/O the only static fall-out of the Dynamic Buddha nature (I'm
not versed in their terminology) .

Andre:
I am Bodvar, I am: cowdung! Cowdung Bodvar. The Buddha rests just as comfortably in cowdung as in the electrical circuits of a motorcycle.

Bodvar:
but what is adamant is that all and any
intellectual development must be based on the subject/object
distinction in some or other form, it must to fulfill its role of subduing
social values!

Andre:
No. It only fulfills your SOM/SOL argument.

Bodvar:
For the creator of a metaphysics that has as
its purpose to transcend the mental/material distinction it's quite a
mouthful.

Andre:
As said to Mary the other day, I'd rather be hit by an idea (intellectual PoV i.e. subjective) than by a rock (inorganic PoV i.e. objective)! To 'transcend' THAT distinction can be very dangerous.

Bodvar:

I know and agee profoundly with the upper-level-out-of-the-lower tenet,
and that all levels reveals its parent if pursued deep and far enough.

Andre:
If pursued deep and far enough we end up with Quality.

Bodvar:
No trouble at all, but MOQ's point is that the MORAL code between the
levels is absolute.

Andre:
In the MOQ there are no absulutes.

Bodvar:
...you are the only "orthodox" left who forwards some kind of defense from MOQ reasoning.

Andre:
Glad you think so but I believe you are mistaken in the 'only' bit.