[MD] Reading & Comprehension

[skutvik at online.no]

Andre, Krimel, Absolutely All 

Fri June

Bodvar to Krimel:
> > This leads to the false impression that there remains an
> > unscathed Quality atop the DQ/SQ dichotomy, and made the latter-day
> > Pirsig (in the Summary of 2005) say that the MOQ is the "static" part of
> > a still greater Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics. This is horribly wrong IT
> > IS QUALITY WHICH IS DIVIDED!
 
Andre:
> The 'false impression' is entirely yours Bodvar. Quality remains
> 'unscathed' because it cannot be scathed. Static patterns of value are
> abstracted from the (Quality) stimulus... . DQ, as used in LILA in
> this instance,(it is used as denoting Quality and other times as the
> referent to...) is used as a static intellectual reference to Quality!
> All concepts need to be kept out of Quality. You cannot accept this, I
> know but because of your non acceptance you reach the 'Quality/MOQ
> meta-metaphysics result which is complete cowdung. Quality CANNOT BE
> DIVIDED! 


I saw the unfortunate of my "dividing Quality" statement    ...  for 
Chrissake it's as Pirsigs says: 

There is QUALITY and static levels of  QUALITY!! 

Yours above does not face the issue at all which is Pirsig's claim that 
the "Dynamic/Static" constellation is the STATIC part of a still greater 
"Quality/MOQ" metaphysics. This is untenable because it leads to an 
infinite metaphysical regress. Try to muster the unpolluted rest of your 
brain..                    

Bodvar