[MD] Reading & Incomprehension

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Wed Jun 16 05:26:43 PDT 2010


On Jun 16, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> With MoQ representing Reality = Quality(unpatterned experience(DQ)/patterned
> experience(sq)), there is no 'I' to be hit, and no-thing to hit it.   You write
> gibberish too.
> 
> Andre:
> Upon first reading I thought this was a very astute observation Marsha

Marsha:
Flattery will get you nowhere.  


> Andre continues:
> but a second reading taught me that it is a rather silly one. The MOQ is a STATIC
> representation of reality.  It is not Reality itself....

Marsha:
Oh, you should have stuck with the first reading.  Quality is indivisible, undefinable 
and unknowable.  Quality (unpatterned experience:(DQ)/patterned experience(sq))
is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.


> Andre:
> Bodvar has objectified it and in this little response you have too.  

Marsha:
That is the function of intellectual patterns, mine, Bo's and yours.  Your not objectifying it IS
objectifying it.  But that is why I stick with:  Quality (unpatterned experience:(DQ)/patterned experience(sq.))


> Andre:
> He loves it, he lives in it.
> For him it is experience itself!!! but the MOQ does NOT contain DQ!  It's as dead as a doornail.

Marsha:
You project that HE loves and lives it, and then extend its meaning to gibberish.  


> Andre:
> Of course there is no 'I' to be hit, and no-thing to hit (dynamically) it but if that bus down the
> road approaches me at 100 kms an hour I will jump, simply because the bus is part of the
> same illusion that I am (conventionally/statically).

Marsha:
I bet you will leap out of the way without a single thought to do so.   Even if what you saw 
was a shadow, you would leap out of the way without a single thought to do so. And afterwords 
will come all the endless retelling of the projected incident on which your self is built.     


> Andre:
> Seems the 'gibberish' slides both ways eh? Let's keep the perspectives straight.

Yes, again a recognition, again and again and again.  I am dim-witted too.   


 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list