[MD] Reading & Incomprehension

[MarshaV]

On Jun 16, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> 
> Marsha:
> You project that HE loves and lives it, and then extend its meaning to gibberish.
> 
> Andre:
> I am not projecting anything. Bodvar has said so! He says Quality=MOQ!

Marsha:
This statement can be interpreted many different ways.  I can see from different angles.  
It is your projecting it into gibberish that defines you.   The MoQ represents reality as 
Quality, both as a symbol and as an explanation.   You and Bill Clinton can quibble 
over the meaning of the word 'is' or the symbol '='.       


> Andre:
> For goodness sake how silly can you get: live in a shoe, live in a metaphysics,
> live in a story and convince yourself that this is Reality...that this is unpatterned,
> pre-intellectual,pre-conceptual experience.

Marsha:
And you criticize my statements as trying to escape the responsibility of making sense?   


> Andre:
> It reminds me of people worshipping their flag,their favourite football team, their
> favourite god,their favourite anything that has nothing to do with their own experience.
> The MOQ is a finger leading to... it is an idea and Bodvar elevates this idea to
> Reality itself. Sad, sad, sad.

Marsha:
More sense-making???   Words are just labels pointing to a relative meaning, 
your words have no special status.   And your direct or indirect name-calling does
no warrant the claim of reasonableness.  


> 
> Marsha:
> Yes, again a recognition, again and again and again.  I am dim-witted too.
> 
> Andre:
> And this is the dim-witted sillyness you apply everytime we have a conversation
> and I have suggested this to you before.

Marsha:
I might write you a few sentences on the dark night of the soul, but this is only a 
hint at my own knowing the limitation of words.  
 

> Marsha:
> The back door stuff as a way out. This is not conducive to having a
> reasonable (i.e.static) argument nor conversation.

Marsha:
Reasonable?    All intellectual patterns exist within bubbles of paradox and 
anomalies.  I want to accommodate such irrationalities as best I can.  There is 
no 'in' or 'out' to confine my knowing or the words I choose to represent it.  
 
 
 

 
 
 
  
 
___