[MD] Transhumanism

[X Acto]

Bodvar,
Isnt self/other another way of saying subject/object?
-Ron


----- Original Message ----
From: "skutvik at online.no" <skutvik at online.no>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sat, June 19, 2010 3:51:57 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Transhumanism

Ron, All. 

18 June:

Andre:
> > > And you are according it the highest (intellect)ual status...and
> > > defend it to the tooth!

Bodvar:
> > The proverbial in-out metaphysical turn that made SOM into the static 
> > intellectual level also robbed it of the authority to make morals
> > "subjective", on the contrary its subject/object distinction became a
> > moral subset.  So it's possible to defend intellect and attack SOM.   

Ron:
> I'd like to know how you seemingly place the s/o distinction on the
> biological level then claim that it IS the intellectual level.

> can you answer this?

Where do I place the S/O distinction on the biological level?  I think it's 
Mary and I haven't yet figured out her assertion. All levels have an 
"self/not self" arrangement that their respective immune systems are 
built on, but biology's is definitely not S/O-ish, rather "this body/foreign 
body.  

Bodvar      







Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html