[MD] Transhumanism

[MarshaV]

On Jun 19, 2010, at 2:24 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:

> And I'd be fine with that, I could then say "Mr. Pirsig, here is why I think
> you are wrong, and why a MOQ is strengthened by including them". 

Hi Arlo,

It sounds to me like you've made the MoQ a thing to be strengthened.  
I know how tricky words can be.  They can be near impossible to make 
some important points.  But it does sound like you're reifying the MoQ.
I do the same thing because of many decades of thinking in terms of 
objects.  It's not JUST language problems.  It is often old patterns that 
have things predefined as independent.  That's why I say when I'm in 
the 'not this, not that' mode I'm doing good, otherwise I might be running 
on automatic, which by default is subject/object dualism.



Marsha 


 
___