[MD] Transhumanism

[skutvik at online.no]

Andre.

19 June:

Bodvar before:
> > All levels have an "self/not self" arrangement that their respective
> > immune systems are built on, but biology's is definitely not S/O-ish,
> > rather "this body/foreign body.

Andre:
> What a load of misunderstanding you are continuing Bodvar. Nothing
> 'this.../foreign body ' crap. 

You sound more and more apoplectic every day. 

> Look at it in terms of value, of quality of freedom! The phases and
> parts within (and between) each level are 'fighting' out a moral
> battle. It's the code's level ...remember? 

About the levels' immune systems it's straight from LILA where Pirsig 
says the biological "self/not self" is the model, check the books before 
starting to foam. Pirsig sees law-enforcement (police) as the social 
system, however they are like the biological T-cells, there is an 
authority that directs police and that is the LAW and the law rests on 
our "cause/not our cause" distinction.   

> Nothing 'not you' because 'not me' SOM bullshit.Biology a
> 'self/not-self' arrangement? In-organic patterns of value a
> 'self/not-self arrangement, social patterns ipso facto, intellectual
> ipso fa... now I know! You simply maintain your SOL/SOM crap. It
> figures. 

You would have made it big as a Chinese Red Guard. But over to the 
intellectual level's immune system where Pirsig refers to psychiatry 
and its effort to try to convert him (in its time) "back to objective reality" 
(LILA page 335) Is there a better indication that he sees intellect as the 
S/O distinction (the value of telling what's objective and from what's 
subjective? 


> I really thought you had a good grasp of the MOQ but I am challenged
> with each new post.You are off your rockers!

Take care and watch your blood pressure.

Bodvar