[MD] Transhumanism

[plattholden at gmail.com]

Hi Bo, Ron

Self/other reflects the same dualism of subject/object that the MOQ relegates 
to the intellectual level. In both "splits" values are completely absent. Thus, 
from the MOQ perspective they are synonyms. 

Platt 


On 21 Jun 2010 at 9:52, skutvik at online.no wrote:

> Ron
> 
> 19 June you asked:
> 
> > Isnt self/other another way of saying subject/object? -Ron 
> 
> No, the subject/object distinction implyes something much more 
> "grave". Exactly what ZAMM tells about as SOM. Why ask me when 
> you have it all in that book. It was the emergence (not in its modern 
> full-fledged form) of the detached subject independent of the objective 
> world it observes. NB! don't start about the paradoxes this creates, 
> THAT is MOQ's very purpose to "repair".
> 
> Bodvar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html