[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Mon Jun 21 13:21:16 PDT 2010


On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to All and no-mind:
> 
> Seems to me DQ and sq are not separate and independent, but
> mutually interdependent.  But may I have misinterpreted...
> 
> Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience)
> 
> Andre:
> No you have not misinterpreted Marsha. The point I was trying to make is that the one does not, and cannot pre-suppose the other.
> 
> I firmly believe in the Najarguna argument of co-dependent arising. It is a wonderful argument and makes a lot of 'sense'.
> 
> Both 'make' eachother ('aha'!) possible.
> 


Hi Andre,

Agreement is nice...     Try the Two Truths debate if you want a head banger.  Ouch!   


Marsha 





 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list