[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Mon Jun 21 13:21:16 PDT 2010
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
> Marsha to All and no-mind:
>
> Seems to me DQ and sq are not separate and independent, but
> mutually interdependent. But may I have misinterpreted...
>
> Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience)
>
> Andre:
> No you have not misinterpreted Marsha. The point I was trying to make is that the one does not, and cannot pre-suppose the other.
>
> I firmly believe in the Najarguna argument of co-dependent arising. It is a wonderful argument and makes a lot of 'sense'.
>
> Both 'make' eachother ('aha'!) possible.
>
Hi Andre,
Agreement is nice... Try the Two Truths debate if you want a head banger. Ouch!
Marsha
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list