[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[skutvik at online.no]

Horse

22 June: you said

> If you could come up with a single coherent argument then you might,
> possibly, get somewhere but so far even that seem unattainable.

I can come up with several if you promise - under oath (not oats :-) - to 
to treat my arguments seriously and thoroughly, no smokescreenish 
manoeuvers or repetition of the lie that Pirsig has rejected the SOL 
because it is the the LATEST statement that counts. Promise?. And 
BTW can you - in you own words - tell me what Ron asks of me, no 
copying of his.
.     
Bodvar





















> 
> Horse
> 
> 
> On 22/06/2010 13:06, skutvik at online.no wrote:
> > And FYI Arlo, Pirsig's latest communique was: "If the SOL has value
> > it will percolate to the top"  and it seems to be on its way up.
> > Please stop this slanderous way of debating.
> 
> -- 
> 
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring
> production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." - Frank
> Zappa
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
>