[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[Marsha Valkyr]

On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

Marsha reacting to Craig's suggestion:
>
>My answer to this quote would be NO! RMP's recognition sent him off to the mental institution. Having had such a realization, it's easy for him to say!!! I  don't think making an intellectual switch from objects (thing-in-itself) to  patterns (ever-changing, relational, unbounded, impermanent) does the trick.
>
>Well, that's my opinion and I'm sticking to it!
>
>Andre:
>And hereby you completely nullify Phaedrus' efforts (and pain and suffering) described in ZMM and LILA at presenting a most real, truthful representation of direct experience the intellectual experience is expanded with.
>

Marsha:
Your statement is complete nonsense.  If Mr. Pirsig would want to stifle my experience with a reasoned communication, or a dance, I would be open to it, but I could no more consider your posts authority than if my 6-year-old grandson decided to explain Phaedrus' effort.



>You do not accept the MOQ's most basic starting point.
>

The MoQ's most basic starting point is Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience.) 


Talking about the observation that 'my [Andre's] posts are a mirror of [my own] confusion'.
>

Well, mine are too.   That is why I revel in: not this, not that.  



You are some twister my dear lady! and it is not Chubby Checker stuff.
>

You are soooo poetic, you take my breath away with your beauty.    



Marsha