[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[MarshaV]

On Jun 24, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Ham Priday wrote:

> 
> If "subject-object metaphysics" is intended to mean the perception of reality as a pluralistic system whose physical components evolve and move in orderly fashion, it is the physical world we all experience, not "metaphysics".  How can any philosophy be "opposed to" experience or existence?  Even a metaphysical thesis that transcends space/time existence (definitely not the MOQ) cannot be "opposed" to it.

Hi Ham,

Does this work?  

Subject-object metaphysics reflects the view that reality is made of inherently 
existing self and objects, and an individuals thoughts, being ephemeral (ever-
changing, relational, unbounded, impermanent), are not real.  This view, though, 
is a learned set of conceptual attributes overlaid onto experience.  The MoQ is 
not opposed to experience, but the SOM definition.

Marsha