[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sat Jun 26 10:36:19 PDT 2010


On Jun 26, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Arlo:
> 
> And so he called for a root expansion of western rationality, from one based on
> SOM premises to one based on what he termed MOQ premises.
> 
> Andre:
> Nice one Arlo. I am really beginning to wonder:The expansion from SOM premises (understanding) to MOQ premises (experience) should not be too difficult...I mean, it is tricky but can be done. (Bodvar,Platt, Marsha and Mary disagree! they want to see blood...a revolution).
> 
> Its only four that are percolating and simmering.
> 
> I'd rather switch the machine off.
> 
> The root expansion is denied. This is the idea I am getting from the' gang of four'. ( and I am only saying this because Bodvar loves to use this sort of stuff).
> 
> Phaedrus asks the priest about the wafer...the priest says... this is the body of christ! Phaedrus asks yea, but you mean...symbolically? the priest says NO, it really is!
> 
> Bodvar asks Mr. Pirsig about the MOQ...Mr. Pisig says...this is my idea of reality! Bodvar says, yea, this is it...literally! Mr. Pirsig says NO, it is analogue upon analogue...it is an intellectual pattern of value...as intellectually experienced.
> 
> Bodvar says: nonsense the MOQ = Reality;  the wafer =  the body of christ. The wafer = my experience of christ. Good luck Bodvar.


Limp, limp, limp...   


 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list