[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[MarshaV]

On Jun 28, 2010, at 5:15 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> Where is YOUR evidence and demonstration, Andre?
> 
> Andre:
> I have suggested it: the MOQ (DQ/sq).
> 
> Mr. Pirsig himself has suggested several. There is Yin/Yang, Form and formlessness. Others on this list have presented them. I mean, you are just going in loops all the time.

MoQ(DQ/sq) is a label pointing to an intellectual pattern.  If is 
not such a label, please explain how it bypasses such a function? 
Seems to me MoQ(DQ/sq) is meaningless if it is without explanation 
using reified concepts.

Show me the quotes where Mr Pirsig states a correlation between 
DQ/sq and yin/yang.  

Even Nagarjuna talking about Emptiness had reified it as a concept, 
and why in the end Emptiness is empty of inherent existence.   


> All I am waiting for is that you reject them because they do not meet up with your criteria, and the loop continues.


I reject them because you don't _explain_ or _demonstrate_ how they 
function.  Because if you did they would prove to represent reified 
concepts and the rules for their rational analysis and manipulation.
 
And if you cannot prove my interpretation is wrong, it is an interpretation 
that is as correct as yours.  YOUR loop continues; my interpretation 
allows for multiple static truths.  
 
 
 
 
___