[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[MarshaV]

On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:12 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:

> [Marsha]
> Who has been designated the thought police and by whom?  
> 
> [Arlo]
> Can the idiotic rhetoric. 
> 
> [Marsha]
> Where does RMP _emphatically_ reject Bo's interpretation.  All I've ever read
> were weak suggestions that it didn't seem right. 
> 
> [Arlo]
> Why would you even need more? If that (the SOL) is what he meant, he would have
> said so. Instead he said it "undermines the MOQ". 
> 
> What I don't understand is why its not enough for you SOMists to propose an
> alternative to what Pirsig said, you have to convince yourself that despite his
> own denials, he is too stupid to understand what he really meant (you, of
> course, in your brilliance, however, understand what he himself is too dense to
> see).
> 
> So support Bo's MOQ. Love it. Shout "derned interlictials" from every hilltop.
> But it is NOT Pirsig's MOQ, where he is clear that the intellectual level was
> never proposed to be "SOM".


RMP is vey, very clear where he writes:

While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served.
  (LILA, Chapter 32)

 
___