[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[Ian Glendinning]

Huh ! Marsha
What you say (specifically said in response to Andre) DOES fall in my
expectation of wisdom - smack on target - without doubt I said. No
pleasing some people ?

(Winding up intellectuals and dogmatists ? Your arguments with Arlo,
Bo, Matt, DMB, Krim, etc, etc ... to their mutual frustration, me
included. I assume your motive may be fun, but either way your wisdom
is not in doubt - I repeat. )

Ian

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:15 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>
>> Marsha,
>>
>> Andre asked
>> What part of you wants evidence?
>>
>> Marsha, you responded:
>> The young at heart part.  The old wizen part knows not this, not that.
>>
>> Your mischievous motives in winding up the intellectuals and
>> dogmatists is sometimes suspect Marsha, but I never doubt you really
>> get it. "The quality of wisdom is not strain'd"
>> Ian
>
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> What do you mean winding up the intellectuals/dogmatists?
>
> What is an intellectual?  I don't remember you having a definition.
>
> What I get and don't get is experienced.  If what I say doesn't fall
> within your expectation of wisdom, what am I to do?  I have not
> claimed enlightenment, but my most enlightened thoughts, though,
> are of the not this, not that kind.  (Someday I will talk of having my
> words melt.)
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>