[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[Platt Holden]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Horse <horse at darkstar.uk.net> wrote:

> Hi Platt
>
> Where did Pirsig say this? I believe he talked about a code of art and this
> was in the context of relating Intellect to DQ. If there is a level of art
> then it becomes static quality - something that art is not - or shouldn't be
> anyway!
>
> Cheers
>
>  Horse


Hi Horse,

Chapter 13 of Lila. The context is the supremacy of higher moral codes of
lower with the top being Dynamic morality which might be called a code of
art  From Pirsig's comments about the MOQ being open to improvements
(philosophy vs. philosophology) I presume the MOQ, like art, isn't static,
or shouldn't be anyway. What do you think?

Regards,

>
> On 28/06/2010 17:09, plattholden at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Which is why we might want to resurrect Pirsig's suggestion that there
>> might be
>> a fifth level of Art. In such a level I would argue the MOQ truly belongs.
>> What
>> do you think?
>>
>>
>
>
>