[MD] Quality/Tao

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan to everyone:
>
> Problems are opportunities for improvement. I'd have to go back and
> review the archives but right off hand I don't recall any problems
> with Quality vs Dynamic Quality. As I said in a previous post, I do
> recall some discussions with Paul Turner on this subject that weren't
> resolved to my satisfaction but I'd had to go back and refresh my
> memory before commenting more.
>
> Andre:
> Hi Dan, Anthony (in his PhD) suggests the 2 perspective approach to Pirsig's
> use of Quality and Dynamic quality in LILA, which he uses interchangeably.
> Paul picked up on this and gave some (for me clarifying) insights in their
> different uses, by quoting examples.
> Dq is referred to when applying to the static intellectual reference (in
> your words 'to denote the undefined'). Quality is used when 'describing'
> from a dynamic perspective.
>
> At least this is my understanding.

Hi Andre

Thank you for the reference. I remember Paul had a blog going for a
while where he explored ideas pertaining to this. Very interesting, I
agree.

Thanks again,

Dan