[MD] MD Quality, DQ and SQ
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Wed Dec 7 23:35:18 PST 2005
Rebecca
On 6 Dec 2005 at 15:53, Rebecca Temmer wrote:
> Rebecca:
> That wasn't my question at all. What I wanted to know was whether, in
> Paul's view, Arete and DQ were the same things. I have not come to any
> firm conclusions about the social and intellectual levels. I'm
> willing to postulate, however, that Arete can be both social and
> intellectual.
My ability "to make friends and influence people" never fails, but I
constantly believe that people are concerned with the important
issues and it was the "dialectics" that misled me to believe you
wondered why ZMM describes the "dialectics" as a loss of Aretê.
That Aretê=Quality we all know.
> Rebecca:
> Why is it that every argument that is made on this discussion group
> must somehow be twisted and contorted to fit your theory? You
> misconstrued my question to begin with. Perhaps you didn't understand
> what I was trying to get at. Now I've given you my impressions of the
> situation and you should understand that in no way do I agree with
> your assertions of Subject/Object Logic being the fourth level.
"My assertion" is written all over the MOQ and it is constantly
gaining ground. For instance, in the beginning the SOM was seen
as one recent intellectual pattern, this was while the 4th level was
regarded "an exact equivalent of mind". After years Pirsig
appeared and declared the mind-intellect to be faulty, and also
said that the Greeks developed intellect which means that what
ZMM describes as SOM is the intellectual level. If you
understand the ramifications of this you will see that this is a total
about-turn, but to admit anything ... and now all kinds of tricks are
applied: ZMM's message is not about the emergence of SOM,
SOM is something from time immemorial (DMB). The first Greek
thinkers weren't somists (Paul). It doesn't surprise me that I'm
regarded some spoil-sport, so many wants the MOQ to be
another NewAge thing, but it is philosophical upheaval and no
one can be allowed to destroy it . OK now I sound like a
megalomaniac too ;-)
Bo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list