[MD] MD Two Theses in the MOQ

ian glendinning psybertron at gmail.com
Fri Dec 16 04:55:14 PST 2005


Rebecca, Mike,

Rebecca, if your comment was in response to mine (can't tell), then I
already said "that's no reason not to"

Mike, Then you see it completely wrong - or I've missed your ironic "whoosh".

Ian

On 12/14/05, Michael Hamilton <thethemichael at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/05, Rebecca Temmer <ratemmer.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But if we don't do it, we don't get anywhere.
> > Something about the journey being more important than the destination.
> > Because ultimately the end is death and none of it matters then anyhow.
>
> Agreed. The way I see it, if language is problematic in the MOQ, then
> the problem is not with langauge, but with the MOQ.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list