[MD] MD Two Theses in the MOQ

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

>From: "David M" <davidint at blueyonder.co.uk>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
>Subject: Re: [MD] MD Two Theses in the MOQ
>Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:37:55 -0000
>
>Paul
>
>
> > Paul:  Dynamic Quality is not a thing but neither is value.  Things are
> > static patterns of values.  I would have thought you would know that.
>
>DM: Nice point.....

Hi David M

Yes the price of oil has been up and down lately... oh... that has nothing 
to do with what you said. But I think it's a nice point too. You're not 
listening. You've come all this way and you're not listening.

>
>
> > Paul:  On the contrary, after much careful consideration of the matter
> > over
> > the last couple of years I think it both possible and desirable to unite
> > ZMM
> > and LILA into a coherent thesis.  Furthermore I think the general rule 
>of
> > thumb is that the later work should take precedence over the earlier 
>work
> > where there are inconsistencies.
>
>
>DM: Surely that makes good sense.

Don't call me Surely.

Dan