[MD] MD Two Theses in the MOQ

[David M]

Mike

Would it be useful to suggest that in the MOQ language
is just a set of evolving forms or SQ emerging from DQ
used to isolate and recognise patterns in our experience?
Hence SOM is one way of cutting up experience, MOQ
another.

DM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Hamilton" <thethemichael at gmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] MD Two Theses in the MOQ


> Ian,
> 
> I wrote: The way I see it, if language is problematic in the MOQ, then
> the problem is not with langauge, but with the MOQ.
> 
> You replied: Then you see it completely wrong - or I've missed your
> ironic "whoosh".
> 
> Never heard of an ironic whoosh before, sounds like fun though!
> Anyway, maybe I was sounding more ominous there than I meant to. The
> key word was "if". I just don't see why we should have to apologise
> for discussing the MOQ or intellectualising about it - so long as we
> do it with due care.
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>