[MD] Religious experience & thinking in an MOQ context

[David M]

SA:>  So religious thinking of the past was more focused
> on static quality and today, it is more focused on
> dynamic quality.  I know in another thread you brought
> this up ([MD] False Messiah).  If you would like to
> discuss some of the points you brought up with Ant and
> I commented upon with questions in this thread it
> might be prudent.  I am wondering if belief and all in
> its' sphere of thinking is religious in nature.  Or,
> as science would need philosophy for thought, does
> philosophy and science and other fields of knowledge
> need religion for belief?  Or is there something else
> to this?    
> 
>

DM: Rather I think the religious future, if it has one, needs
to focus on DQ, which is what lies beyond science
and its ability to describe & quantify SQ. Personally
I do not see the word 'belief' as very useful. I think the
true religious impulse is about the relationship of existence
to DQ, theflux, creativity & death. I think critical thought
(about life, experience, knowledge) has to examine all the
same territory as religion, science and philosophy any subset
of these would be missing something. All the rest is
history and story telling.