[MD] Religion is subordinate to science

[Squonkonguitar at aol.com]

Oh Squank,

You are so adorable.
 
Squonk: Awwwww shucks. (Blush) You know flattery will get you  everywhere.

Oh, and Squank, why didn't you opt for Pirsig's definition of  intellectual 
static patterns? Ya' know, "indepedantly manipulable  symbols"?  I mean, 
isn't that what we are supposed to be using?
 
Squonk: Interesting. You knock the invitation, tell me why you knock the  
invitation, then go and accept the invitation!
Q. Would you like a cream bun?
A. Are you talking to me? What the hell would i want with a cream bun you  
fatuous imbicile! Don't be so stupid! Yes please.

I'm so glad you're  back.  You will clearly raise the level of conversation 
around  here.

Matt
 
Squonk: You could begin by addressing any points raised. What's the point  of 
contributing if no one addresses the points raised? I raised the point about  
religion being composed of mainly if not all social patterns (Dallas reminds 
me  that DQ is at the core of true religion and i accept that) but Kev doesn't 
want  to leave his comfort blancket behind.
And you act the goat.
I've got things to be getting on with you know?
 
Squonk