[MD] MoQ as religion [Belief Defininition]

[Heather Perella]

Hello David,

     We find ourselves at a point of definition on two
threads.  
     It seems that your definition of DQ is 'something
unusual'.
     My definition of DQ is DQ is 'something that does
not have definition'.
     
     Something unusual.  That is an interesting way of
viewing DQ.  The universe is DQ.  I agree with your
definition, but I still see the definition that I have
been using as valuable and also DQ.  Something that is
unusual, we may define it with science or philosophy,
but do we truly have THE definition of what it is that
we are talking about.  We may statically latch layers
of definition upon something as signposts pointing
towards the static quality in question, but do we
still question it, do we still notice something about
it that is unusal and has no definition available for
us to staticly latch with layers of identification?  I
still think we do.  When we reach this point about
anything, then I say we are at the horizon of static
quality meeting with the rising sun of DQ.  The
dharmakaya light shines through our pigeon holes and
something dynamic may happen to our lives as long as
we don't turn away from this event.
     Does Pirsig give an outright definition to DQ?  

Thanks 
SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com