[MD] The differentiating nothingness

[David M]

Reinier

and again,what does 'manifest' mean if not appearance from nowhere
and out of nothing?

DM
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <platootje at netscape.net>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] The differentiating nothingness


> Hello Ham,
> 
> Further on nothingness and a creation theory:
> 
> I?m taking my time to reply because I really am thinking about the 
> concept of nothingness. Two main objections against it remain:
> 1)  You still haven?t convinced me how my theory based on duality needs 
> a ?nothingness?. I?ve pointed out that duality can and should be 
> limited to existence so leaving out nothingness does not do any harm to 
> it.
> 2)  There are indications from quantum physics that there is a universal 
> interconnection of everything, in other words, there are no holes in 
> existence
> 
> Then there are minor objections:
> I believe there is no a priori particle. No smallest building block. 
> Again, quantum physics seems to indicate that it?s the experience plays 
> a vital role in the manifestation of matter. This leads me to believe 
> there?s no fundamental difference between a chair that?s experienced or 
> a thought that?s experienced, or a feeling that?s experienced, or an 
> emotion that?s experienced.
> They are all X?s experienced because they are separated by experience 
> from their not-X?s.
> So fitting in nothingness there seems an unnecessary and complex 
> operations which in fact would remove the duality because then there 
> would not only be an X and a not-X but also nothingness that is both 
> other to X and not-X (as opposes to Essence).
> Also if there would be nothingness the primary Essential division would 
> be between existence and nothingness while I think that the primary 
> division is the division between I and not-I (or the creation of 
> self-awareness).
> 
> As for the creation itself, this may well be a deliberate Essential act 
> to find out if man would indeed find back it?s own Essence. So yes, you 
> may call it a game.
> 
> I?m not sure if I?ve answered all your separate questions, I?ve looked 
> at your thesis on the internet several times but, I like parts of it, I 
> disagree with other parts.
> 
> Maybe we can step over our different view point on nothingness and move 
> on.
> 
> Best regards,
> Reinier.
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________
> Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
> Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
> http://mail.netscape.com
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>