[MD] False Messiah

[Heather Perella]

Hey dmb,

     I am referring to your Sat Apr 8 13:59:23 PDT
2006 post.  You are mentioning a literal God is from a
mythology and that Christ was not literally here.  I
am saying Buddha was literally here, and why after all
the documents from that time period do you need to
argue that Christ was not a literal person who was one
with G-d?  Any of the other questions I have are
referenced from your posting on the above given date
and time.  Any questions in particular you have refer
to that posting and my comments to that posting.  If
you have any other questions from my posting please
feel free to ask specifically and I will try to
clarify them for you.

Thanks,
SA

--- david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> SA:
> 
> Sorry, but I honestly don't know what you're talking
> about. I can see that 
> you have lots of questions about something I said,
> but I don't know what 
> that something is. As a result, I don't know how to
> make sense of your 
> questions. Would you mind attaching the questions to
> the statements in some 
> way? Otherwise, I just can't oblige you.
> 
> dmb
> 
> 
> >From: Heather Perella
> <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> >To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> >Subject: Re: [MD] False Messiah
> >Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Hello db,
> >
> >      I am having a hard time fitting in your
> literal
> >Jesus, that was really a mythology, but somehow
> became
> >a historical person written on numerous documents
> from
> >different cultures in contact with the Middle East
> >region.  Why?  For one, this idea that a literal
> >historical person messes things up.  Buddha was a
> >historical person.  Southern Buddhism (Theravada)
> >notes a historical Buddha and concentrates not just
> on
> >what he taught, but on his life.  The northern
> school
> >(Mahayana) of Buddhism does not concentrate on the
> >historical life of Buddha, it focuses on the
> >philosophy.
> >      Why do we not see this older religion behind
> a
> >country having more superpower, or even equal to or
> >closer to, kind of power the U.S. has from your
> >description?  Time doesn't have to be the factor. 
> I
> >think it is the way people have been interpreting
> >Christ and the literal minded way western
> civilization
> >takes on questions of what is correct or incorrect.
> >Thames 'all is water' that is thought of as the
> >beginning of scientific inquiry.  The literalness
> of
> >science itself.  How a world without a G-d is the
> >right world, that is hard core solid literalism. 
> What
> >you see is what you get.  Dirt, clouds, and
> birds...
> >these are seen, and everything else needs to be
> tested
> >to see if it exists.  You can imagine, but don't
> let
> >your imagination take you too far, because you will
> >not be in the real world?  Isn't this the current
> >'what you see is only what is' - mentally?
> >      Puritans put  women on trial and proved with
> >observation that they were witches, people saw
> them,
> >too many people as that, saw them as witches so -
> they
> >must have been witches.  Pure observation is a
> >downfall too, don't you think?  Lucky we have
> science
> >to show it was a mold on the wheat that gave those
> >females this unexplainable (other than saying they
> >were witches) condition of frantic behaviors.  So
> we
> >have something wrong with all of these 'things' we
> use
> >and depend upon.  So why do we use and depend upon
> >them, because in concert they balance each other
> out
> >and all the loose ends will still have a need to be
> >threaded, to tie up, and the MOQ might be the next
> >stitch.
> >
> >
> >SA
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >moq_discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
>
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger!
> Download today - it's FREE! 
>
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com