[MD] Are we the people stupid?
Platt Holden
pholden at davtv.com
Fri Apr 21 16:41:42 PDT 2006
[Arlo]
> And also let's not forget "the conservatives who keep trumpeting about
> the virtues of free enterprise are normally just supporting their own
> self-interest. They are just doing the usual cover-up for the rich in
> their age-old exploitation of the poor." Amen.
As usual, the Marxist critical thinker takes a quote out of context
(and omits the reference). Pirsig continues:
"The Metaphysics of Quality provides the vocabulary. A free market is a
Dynamic institution. What people buy and what people sell, in other
words what people value, can never be contained by any intellectual
formula. What makes the marketplace work is Dynamic Quality. The market
is always changing and the direction of that change can never be
predetermined.
"The Metaphysics of Quality says the free market makes everybody richer-
by preventing static economic patterns from setting in and stagnating
economic growth. That is the reason the major capitalist economies of
the world have done so much better since World War II than the major
socialist economies. It is not that Victorian social economic patterns
are more moral than socialist intellectual economic patterns. Quite the
opposite. They are less moral as static patterns go. What makes the
free-enterprise system superior is that the socialists, reasoning
intelligently and objectively, have inadvertently closed the door to
Dynamic Quality in the buying and selling of things. They closed it
because the metaphysical structure of their objectivity never told them
Dynamic Quality exists." (Lila, 17) Amen and Hallelujah.
> [Platt to Arlo previously]
> How come you never address the Dynamism of capitalism compared to dull"
> socialism?
>
> [Arlo]
> I've said I favor a free market. I also believe to remain free the
> market must be regulated.
A regulated free market is an oxymoron -- except to a Marxist critical
thinker.
> [Khaled to Platt]
> First you have to show me Capitalism that thrived WITHOUT government
> welfare, protection and subsidies.
>
> [Platt]
> To answer, I turn to Pirsig: [quote about Victorian industriousness
> snipped]
>
> [Arlo]
> To answer, I turn to Pirsig.
Khaled is perfectly capable of answering himself without your help.
But, Marxists are well known meddlers in other people's business. So we
understand.
(snip)
It was university intellectuals who took over from the Victorians who
really messed things up:
"In the time that Phaedrus grew up, intellect was dominant over
society, but the results of the new social looseness weren't turning
out as predicted. Something was wrong. The world was no doubt in better
shape intellectually and technologically but despite that, somehow, the
"quality" of it was not good. There was no way you could say why this
quality was no good. You just felt it." (Lila, 22)
And:
"Phaedrus thought that a Metaphysics of Quality could be a replacement
for the paralyzing intellectual system that is allowing all this
destruction to go unchecked. The paralysis of America is a paralysis of
moral patterns. Morals can't function normally because morals have been
declared intellectually illegal by the subject-object metaphysics that
dominates present social thought. These subject-object patterns were
never designed for the job of governing society. They're not doing it.
When they're put in the position of controlling society, of setting
moral standards and declaring values, and when they then declare that
there are no values and no morals, the result isn't progress. The
result is social catastrophe." (Lila, 24)
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list