[MD] False Messiah

Heather Perella spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 26 09:08:29 PDT 2006


Hello Marsha,
 
     At 08:39 AM 4/22/2006, SA wrote:
>Son of G-d was a common
>term used for and by many people during the time
Jesus
>walked the earth.

     Marsha said:
Not by those who were members of the Cult of Isis. 
This 
justification is just so much baloney.


     Not by the Sun Dance people of the Plains in
North America, too, but to call Jesus a son of G-d in
Israel during the time Jesus walked the earth could
have meant either he was king or he was born of the
Creator just as evolutionists say we came from the Big
Bang.  People are saying we come from somewhere, even
if it was we were a bug in our past life.  I don't
know what I was trying to justify here other than the
fact we were born and people did come from somewhere,
even if that place is the earth or our parents.  I was
just pointing out the common use of the concept: son
of G-d, because the common usage of the concept
now-a-days is that their was only one son of G-d, yet,
the translation or use of this idea has only become
shaped into one person after Jesus walked the earth,
probably even more strengthened into one person by the
Catholics.  They have distorted a common term into
some kind of special label reserved only for some
human being that lived here on this earth over a
thousand years ago.  
     This is why we need more Zen.  We need to take it
upon ourselves to understand that we live
enlightenment now in the ordinary life of washing the
dishes.  Notice the new finding of the Gospel of
Judas.  It's just as when the Chinese sought out all
the writings about Buddha.  They traveled through
Afghanistan around the Himalayan Mountains, and
schools were in established. (remember the Buddha
carvings blown up by Bin Laden and gang.  I believe
they are from this time period where the Chinese
couldn't do anything related to Buddhism unless it was
corroborated in a text, thus, found to be written from
a reliable source from India, until Zen which
established Buddha right here, right now.  All the
missing pieces, and devouring of new texts by the
Chinese for hundreds of years to find that missing
piece that seemed to be not found in writing, yet, was
apparent since the writings when studied, they were
found to not answer all the questions students and
teachers had.   The missing element was not in the
writings, but was in their hearts and that's where
Chan (Zen) comes in.  
     The Gospel of Judas.  Is it true?  How does it
change the translations of the Bible?  Is it really
words staticly patterned by Jesus to Judas that have a
truth that is Dynamicly aspired from G-d?  These are
the questions that Christians and others are seeking. 
Any new test uncovered in the sands of the region, and
what's inside the next cave?  Could any of these new
texts settle current debates that have split the
Church into many sects because of the opinions of
humans over what is the truth of G-d?  
     Certain people are looking for answers in the
sand, and in the caves from what they hope is written.
 What is written is true, not what you think?  Even
interpretations are structured by religious leaders
who are revered by the public for what they believe
the leaders must know something hidden that the public
themselves have not yet been able to understand and
experience.  Yet, they do, but don't know it - Zen. 
The Zazen of ordinary life activities.  The aweness in
life... breath, wash dishes, feel the sun, and all
will know this birth we have experienced into this universe.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list