[MD] False Messiah

[MarshaV]

G-d and his Son?  Common usage?  History has been written by its 
violent winners.  If you want to talk of the land of the archetypes 
and fairytales, please do not leave out Mother, Daughter, 
Sister.  They have never been either gods, fathers or sons.

Have you read the book 'Misquoting Jesus : The Story Behind Who 
Changed the Bible and Why'?  The bible is just a book written by 
men.  The oldest New Testament versions are Greek.  None are 
alike.  There are mistakes, subtractions and additions.  The mistakes 
and manipulation have multiplied over the centuries until the first 
printing press.  I have heard Mr. Ehrman, a biblical scholar and the 
author, state the same mistakes and manipulation are contained in the 
Old Testament.

To have some Jewish people, two thousand years ago, call Jesus the 
son of G-d, means what?  That it was written means what?   What did 
it mean compared to all those people who thought otherwise.  That it 
is statically still held as an opinion, doesn't not give it a high 
value.  While it has evolved, it is still quite static.  It's a myth, 
a story, a fairy tale.  While I breathe, wash dishes, feel the sun, 
it has no meaning.

Marsha


At 12:08 PM 4/26/2006, SA wrote:
>Hello Marsha,
>
>      At 08:39 AM 4/22/2006, SA wrote:
> >Son of G-d was a common
> >term used for and by many people during the time
>Jesus
> >walked the earth.
>
>      Marsha said:
>Not by those who were members of the Cult of Isis.
>This
>justification is just so much baloney.
>
>
>      Not by the Sun Dance people of the Plains in
>North America, too, but to call Jesus a son of G-d in
>Israel during the time Jesus walked the earth could
>have meant either he was king or he was born of the
>Creator just as evolutionists say we came from the Big
>Bang.  People are saying we come from somewhere, even
>if it was we were a bug in our past life.  I don't
>know what I was trying to justify here other than the
>fact we were born and people did come from somewhere,
>even if that place is the earth or our parents.  I was
>just pointing out the common use of the concept: son
>of G-d, because the common usage of the concept
>now-a-days is that their was only one son of G-d, yet,
>the translation or use of this idea has only become
>shaped into one person after Jesus walked the earth,
>probably even more strengthened into one person by the
>Catholics.  They have distorted a common term into
>some kind of special label reserved only for some
>human being that lived here on this earth over a
>thousand years ago.
>      This is why we need more Zen.  We need to take it
>upon ourselves to understand that we live
>enlightenment now in the ordinary life of washing the
>dishes.  Notice the new finding of the Gospel of
>Judas.  It's just as when the Chinese sought out all
>the writings about Buddha.  They traveled through
>Afghanistan around the Himalayan Mountains, and
>schools were in established. (remember the Buddha
>carvings blown up by Bin Laden and gang.  I believe
>they are from this time period where the Chinese
>couldn't do anything related to Buddhism unless it was
>corroborated in a text, thus, found to be written from
>a reliable source from India, until Zen which
>established Buddha right here, right now.  All the
>missing pieces, and devouring of new texts by the
>Chinese for hundreds of years to find that missing
>piece that seemed to be not found in writing, yet, was
>apparent since the writings when studied, they were
>found to not answer all the questions students and
>teachers had.   The missing element was not in the
>writings, but was in their hearts and that's where
>Chan (Zen) comes in.
>      The Gospel of Judas.  Is it true?  How does it
>change the translations of the Bible?  Is it really
>words staticly patterned by Jesus to Judas that have a
>truth that is Dynamicly aspired from G-d?  These are
>the questions that Christians and others are seeking.
>Any new test uncovered in the sands of the region, and
>what's inside the next cave?  Could any of these new
>texts settle current debates that have split the
>Church into many sects because of the opinions of
>humans over what is the truth of G-d?
>      Certain people are looking for answers in the
>sand, and in the caves from what they hope is written.
>  What is written is true, not what you think?  Even
>interpretations are structured by religious leaders
>who are revered by the public for what they believe
>the leaders must know something hidden that the public
>themselves have not yet been able to understand and
>experience.  Yet, they do, but don't know it - Zen.
>The Zazen of ordinary life activities.  The aweness in
>life... breath, wash dishes, feel the sun, and all
>will know this birth we have experienced into this universe.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/