[MD] Some Abiding Beliefs

[David]

Quoting David <davidbeck at houston.rr.com>:

> What seems to be certain is there is a source of knowledge.  What
conceptual
> label we give to it, whether it be I, Yo, Je or whatever else is probably
> not as important for what we are discussing as what is the true nature of
> this source of knowledge.  Does it exist independent of the "other"?  Or
is
> it part of Everything and only feels separated due possibly to immersion
in
> a subject/object worldview? 

I believe you find the true nature of the source of knowledge by knowing
yourself. You are eternally separate from others but never apart,  
a paradox of our experienced reality, e.g., you'll never know what it's like
to be kissed by you.


I would agree with that.  The true nature of the source of knowledge is
probably something that can never be defined in logical conceptual terms.  I
still wonder than can we really state for certain there is any "thing" that
knows.  I know this has recently been debated on some threads and we could
probably go on and on with it.  I would like to say for me it seems the best
that can be stated is: There is knowledge of preference, therefore there is
knowledge of preference.


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/