[MD] Kant's Motorcycle
david buchanan
dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Fri Dec 1 21:29:19 PST 2006
LARAMIE quoted Ken Wilber, Up From Eden; Pg. 344 and then said:
I'm sure this is not your intention, Dave, but we need to be careful not to
support evolutionary regression. The "assumptions of SOM" are necessary if
we are to evolve from prerational to transrational.
dmb says:
I'm a big fan of Wilber and I think he's in agreement with Pirsig on this.
In Lila he talks about how the hippies confused dynamic quality and
biological quality in the popular versions of Zen. He talks about how the
intellectuals took sides with biology against social level values. Marx and
Freud and Darwin were all part of the storm. Basically, in ordinary
language, these guys are saying that beauty and sensuality and pleasure are
not to be confused with spiritual bliss or hedonism with freedom. I think
that's what Pirsig's code of Art is all about. In terms of personal
development the pure experience or Dynamic Quality that I'm talking about
here is known by infants and by Zen Masters, but babies aren't enlightened
because one has to have a mind before it can be blown, if you will. I mean,
that is the starkest example I can imagine. Going back to infancy would be
as regressive as it gets.
The only thing I might disagree about is the idea that SOM is needed to
prevent degeneration. In fact, I think Pirsig makes a pretty good case that
SOM is the source of the problem. Well, more specifically the problem is
positivistic materalism, scientific materialism. But this has been quite
dominant and is more like the epitome of SOM rather than just a species of
it.
But I have to point out that this isn't really relevant to radical
empiricism. I mean, you're right but on a different topic entirely. Here we
are talking about a theory of knowledge, an epistemological position. Its
about the relationship between the empiricism of pragmatism and almost every
other school of thought including the dominant one. This is how Pirsig goes
after the amoral rationality underlying these problems, but the problems are
better addressed after the structure of the MOQ, with its levels and moral
codes. All that is a few miles down the road, topic wise.
Thanks.
dmb
_________________________________________________________________
Fixing up the home? Live Search can help
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list