[MD] U.S. Values: the Jones

[Khaled Alkotob]

Arlo, Ant, Platt

Well bringing Current Events into the mix of this discussion.

A certain singing sensation managed to flash her Who-Ha to the public
while on a nightly outing.
The public was outraged.
To cover her Who-Ha she goes to a lingerie shop ( according to the latest
on-line tabloids) and drops $3,800 on 3 thongs and a teddy.

Now i don't know which of these acts SHOULD shock the religious right
more.

The fact that one was seen in their birthday suite, or the fact that a
few families could have been fed and kept warm for the $3,800.

Personally, I am outraged by the misuse of the $3,800 than by her
flashing her Who-Ha

Good Day

Khaled

> [Arlo]
> A quick perusal of the archives reveals that in every one of our 
> recent
> conversations, it is I who have been championing "individual 
> freedom", and you
> who have been championing "laws enforcing conformity". From veils to
> toplessness to refusing immoral orders, it is I who have been the 
> voice of
> individual freedom. On free speech, I gave a recent personal example 
> where I
> argued for freedom, even when the speech was personally repellent. 
> Even when
> you felt your individual freedom was threatened by having the word 
> "nigger"
> banned, I sided with your freedom to utter this word. So your 
> accusation above
> is just more of the typical right-wing propagandic nonsense we've 
> come to
> expect.
> 
> Indeed, the _only_ individual freedom you seem to care about 
> involves "earning
> money" or uttering ethnic slurs.
> 
> And so you find legal restrictions on dumping toxic sludge into my 
> rivers
> "anti-freedom", but then turn around and make the astonishingly 
> immoral claim
> that "banning veils, by law, is a victory for Intellect". You find 
> proposed
> restrictions on saying "nigger" an assault on freedom, but then turn 
> around and
> support laws that force everyone to speak English (good thing for 
> you "nigger"
> is an English word, eh?).
>