[MD] Kant's Motorcycle

[Laird Bedore]

>      [Case]
>   
>> The discussion here is about whether TITs exist at
>> all. Kant thought they
>> did. I do too. 
>>     
>
> [SA]
>      What are TITs using MoQ?  Kant is SOM, as you may
> know.  Would it make a difference as to what TITs are,
> whether one philosophy uses TITs verses another?  I
> wouldn't even know where to begin on these questions.
>
> bears,
> SA
>   

[Laird]
My take is: TITs, in MoQ terms, are "static patterns of value". Stuff, 
before we rationalize into subjects and objects. I think SOM has such a 
tough time with TITs because they expect them to come after the 
rationalization into subjects and objects. It's much simpler when TITs 
come first.

-Laird