[MD] Kant's Motorcycle

[Case]

> [SA]
>      What are TITs using MoQ?  Kant is SOM, as you may
> know.  Would it make a difference as to what TITs are,
> whether one philosophy uses TITs verses another?  I
> wouldn't even know where to begin on these questions.

[Laird]
My take is: TITs, in MoQ terms, are "static patterns of value". Stuff, 
before we rationalize into subjects and objects. I think SOM has such a 
tough time with TITs because they expect them to come after the 
rationalization into subjects and objects. It's much simpler when TITs 
come first.

[Case]
Hmmm, TITs are undefined and unknowable, subjects and objects emerge from
them not just figuratively but literally. Wow, that sounds familiar...