[MD] The MOQ's First Principle

[MarshaV]

Greetings all,

I've never been able to handle the 'group' thing.  I cannot really 
handle more than a three-way conversation.

I don't understand 'balance'.  I earlier asked Platt about a 
statement.  It seems to me that's its a perfect statement of 
balance.  General Peter Pace when asked if the U.S. is winning the 
war in Iraq responded "We're not winning, but we're not losing 
either."   So if by balance you mean this kind of sanity, than I am 
at a loss to understand.

Are any of you balanced?   Do you KNOW balance?

The MOQ is always close in my thoughts, for that reason it does 
influence my actions.  Actions that I hope are breaking my 
boundaries.  And since I am everybody, that's breaking everyone's 
boundaries.  I also buy ZMM for anyone I think might read it.

Just a word to Mike about being an artist.  I don't understand what 
it means to be an artist.  I don't particularly care.  I paint, and 
experience frustration and love in the process.  That's just the way it is.

  I also buy ZMM for anyone I think might read it.

  If I might be so bold as to suggest that you read Platt's thirteen 
MOQ principles (Lila's Child, pp.256-258).  See if, as a whole set, 
they fit.  Yes?  No?  All of the above?


Marsha